Telangana High Court
Telangana High Court
Hyderabad: The High Court arithmetic operation long seat comprising Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice N Tukaramji on Thursday adjudicated the suo motu PIL and issued notices the government and directed to respond to by March 16.
The Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, while commencing the adjudication of the PIL, questioned the GHMC standing counsel and the State’s counsel as to what steps have got been taken to secure such horrific and gruesome incidents doesn’t occur… whether any steps have got been taken to bring into existence some temporary housing for homeless places, where the stray dogs can be kept, so that such incidents of stray dogs attacking humans do not occur.
These stray dogs cannot roam on roads be fond of this, observed CJ. Further, the Chief Justice expressed feeling of sympathy on the deceased young male, when the standing counsel for the State and GHMC informed the judicature that the 3 dogs which attacked the young male were sterilised and later lease off.
Has this event wherein a 4 year elderly young male was mauled by 3 stray dogs moved your scruples, CJ Ujjal Bhuyan questioned the State’s counsel. The long seat issued notices to the Chief Secretary, Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration, Deputy Commissioner of GHMC, Amberpet arithmetic operation, territory Collector Hyderabad and the part of a social group secretarial assistant and TS Legal Services Authority etc.
The Chief Justice after issuing notices said that this is a free from clouds or mist or haze display case where payment can be awarded to the parents of the deceased and a decision on this facet testament be taken on the next appointment of hearing. The Chief Justice had converted the newspaper evaluation which appeared in an English dated February 19 under the caption “A pack of stray dogs maul a four-year-old boy to death in city” into a suo motu not private judicial proceeding.
Writ Plea against MLA
Gongidi Sunitha dismissed
The High Court Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice N Tukaramji on Thursday heard the writ petition filed by B Mahesh, living together or enjoying life in communities person who works at a specific occupation from Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri territory. The petitioner alleged that Gongidi Sunitha, MLA from Alair Assembly body of voters, has amassed riches through unethical and instrumentality for accomplishing some end. Further, his representations before various authorities have got not been considered. The petitioner B Mahesh sought the judicature to point somebody into a certain direction the ECI and IT department to conduct probe against MLA Gongidi Sunita and her Benamis and pick out series of events that form a plot. Hearing on the petition, the Chief Justice long seat queried whether the petitioner has made any like allegations against not the same MLAs or MPs in the earlier than the present time?
V. Krishna Swaroop, counsel for petitioner informed the judicature that the petitioner is a BCom undergraduate dropout, besides living together or enjoying life in communities body of work, he helps his kinsfolk in playing field body of work. Moreover, he is not an IT assessor.
Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan opined that it seemed it was a bogus and blackmailing petition. Further, the CJ Bench observed that the petitioner seeks roaming and phishing enquiry. We are not inclined to purpose Article 226 to point somebody into a certain direction the respondent authorities for roaming and phishing enquiry and dismissed the petition.
